Fri 9 May 2008
Husband and I took the kids to my sister-in-law’s wedding last weekend. The bridegroom is called “Slammer”; this probably gives you a better mental picture of the nuptials than any word-portrait I could produce. (Me: “Why is he called ‘Slammer’? Was he in prison?” Husband: “His real nickname is ‘Slam-Bam.’ Slammer is just sort of…a diminutive of his nickname.”)
It was actually a really fun wedding, being sort of boozy and informal. The children were in their element, particularly Aitch. I barely saw him the whole evening, he was so busy partying, but at one point he asked me to escort him to the bathroom. As we walked through the crowd, he was hailed by children and adults alike: “Aitch! What’s up, buddy! Give me five!” I felt like I was on the arm of the fraternity social chair during Rush Week.
Before the fun reception, though, we were forced to endure a full-court Mass, and I was a bit worried that the boys’ behavior would give away the fact that it was their first appearance at a church service. As I was fretting about that, another worry occurred to me: Would it be better, under the circumstances, to take Communion, or to refuse it?
If it were only a matter of politeness vs. principles, I would definitely vote for taking Communion, both to be sociable and to avoid offense to my mother-in-law, who would be distressed by having our apostasy on display. This was the course that Husband advocated. Catholics, however, have very strict requirements for Communion, and I was concerned that if my mother-in-law was aware of the rules she would be even more offended by our taking Communion when we were not in a state of grace, particularly since neither of us have gone to Confession since contracting our invalid marriage, a mortal sin.
(By the way, how lame is it that our marrying outside the church is an offense on par with murder? What a pathetic cautionary tale we are: “Sin is a slippery slope, kids, and once you stray from the church you could end up like them — hard-working, tax-paying degenerates with two illegitimate but yet legally adopted children, a mortgage, and a dog!”)
About ten years ago, I was in a wedding party where the Communion question came up. All the bridesmaids were Catholic, so I determined that I would take Communion just so I wouldn’t cause any comment by refusing. Before the sacrament, though, the priest specifically disinvited all the non-Catholics and the non-practicing Catholics from Communion. As it happened, the bridegroom and his family were Protestant, and they were pretty offended by the priest’s words. I’ve never heard any other priest lay down the law for Communion since then, though.
What was the right thing to do, in your opinion?
May 9th, 2008 at 11:02 pm
Oh, tricky! I think not taking communion was the right thing to do. At some point your MIL needs to know who you are. (My dad won’t tell his Catholic family that he’s an atheist married to an atheist whose children grew up only going to church on Christmas. And they still don’t know my parents lived together for a year before they got married. My dad is still twelve, apparently).
A friend of mine (Catholic) refused to marry her Catholic fiance in a Catholic church because he hadn’t taken communion/gone to church since leaving high school. I thought it was nice that she didn’t want to make him have a religious ceremony since he wasn’t into it, but no, she thought it would be disrespectful to God. At least her husband got the wedding he wanted although I found her reasoning bizarre.
May 9th, 2008 at 11:04 pm
Also? The Member of the Wedding (Carson McCullers as you obviously know) was the very first play I ever saw not performed by my elementary school. Oregon Shakespeare Festival, I think my tenth birthday. A little trivia about me.
May 10th, 2008 at 7:37 am
grandma’s funeral - the priest asked that everyone in attendance come up but the non-catholics not take the communion. I thought it was nice and inclusive - but being on crutches, I still stayed in my seat - with my sister who wouldn’t go up on “moral grounds” - she felt it was more respectful to those who did believe to not make a mockery of the tradition. My jewish stepfather was starving and was bummed it was just a little piece of bread. To each their own…
May 10th, 2008 at 10:41 am
I was at a wedding last summer where the priest not only dis-invited all non-Catholics, but told the Catholics they could only take communion “if their conscience allowed them to do so”. There were very few takers.
May 10th, 2008 at 11:23 am
As an aside, I am always annoyed at the Bishops who publicly disinvite Catholic politicians who are pro-choice from Communion. I’ve never seen them publicly disinvite pro-death penalty politicians, and if they were consistent, there would be no need for Holy Communion in all of Washington. (A place where there is great need for receiving grace, if you ask me.)
But anyway, my vote … if you were baptized Catholic, then I say it’s between you and God and no one else’s business.
If you’re not a baptized Catholic, or were baptized and no longer believe in God, don’t do it. It’s disrespectful.
And, as someone with a Catholic mom who can relate to your relationship with your MIL, don’t be fooled into thinking there was an easy answer. Either option risked a “discussion” of your heathen ways and her torment over you sending her grandchildren to hell in a handbasket. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t, so you might as well have integrity.
But what we really want to know — did you meet your weight goal?