<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web of Services Position Paper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://72.249.21.88/nonintersecting/?year=2007&#038;monthnum=02&#038;day=20&#038;name=web-of-services-position-paper&#038;feed=feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://72.249.21.88/nonintersecting/2007/02/20/web-of-services-position-paper/</link>
	<description>Life and Technology (non-intersecting)</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 02:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://72.249.21.88/nonintersecting/2007/02/20/web-of-services-position-paper/#comment-4293</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wanderingbarque.com/nonintersecting/2007/02/20/web-of-services-position-paper/#comment-4293</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Eric:&lt;/b&gt; I'm cool with enterprises looking to the W3C for guidance on the issues they face.  But I think the guidance should be to stop using SOAP/WS-*.  One way for the W3C to go about this is to recognize that WS-* is just the latest incarnation of a technology that has so far never been able to span even the enterprise.  And that the technology necessary to span the enterprise should be largely similar to the technology that spans the globe.

From the workshop page:
&lt;blockquote&gt;The aim of this Workshop is to gather interested parties to discuss and provide recommendations to W3C regarding the best approaches to facilitate the processing of business transactions and interactions with systems that pre-date the Web, and address the need to interconnect intranet and/or extranet services using Web technologies.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

How is that not integration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Eric:</b> I&#8217;m cool with enterprises looking to the W3C for guidance on the issues they face.  But I think the guidance should be to stop using SOAP/WS-*.  One way for the W3C to go about this is to recognize that WS-* is just the latest incarnation of a technology that has so far never been able to span even the enterprise.  And that the technology necessary to span the enterprise should be largely similar to the technology that spans the globe.</p>
<p>From the workshop page:</p>
<blockquote><p>The aim of this Workshop is to gather interested parties to discuss and provide recommendations to W3C regarding the best approaches to facilitate the processing of business transactions and interactions with systems that pre-date the Web, and address the need to interconnect intranet and/or extranet services using Web technologies.</p></blockquote>
<p>How is that not integration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Newcomer</title>
		<link>http://72.249.21.88/nonintersecting/2007/02/20/web-of-services-position-paper/#comment-4289</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Newcomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wanderingbarque.com/nonintersecting/2007/02/20/web-of-services-position-paper/#comment-4289</guid>
		<description>Pete -

The answer is very simple, it's because the W3C membership has expressed sufficient interest in the topic to justify a workshop.

It may well turn out that the results of the workshop will not lead to any follow up action by the W3C, but sufficient interest was expressed to dig into the topic further.

Also a minor correction: the workshop is not about enterprise integration.

Thanks again for your participation.

Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete -</p>
<p>The answer is very simple, it&#8217;s because the W3C membership has expressed sufficient interest in the topic to justify a workshop.</p>
<p>It may well turn out that the results of the workshop will not lead to any follow up action by the W3C, but sufficient interest was expressed to dig into the topic further.</p>
<p>Also a minor correction: the workshop is not about enterprise integration.</p>
<p>Thanks again for your participation.</p>
<p>Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Tilkov's Random Stuff</title>
		<link>http://72.249.21.88/nonintersecting/2007/02/20/web-of-services-position-paper/#comment-4219</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Tilkov's Random Stuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wanderingbarque.com/nonintersecting/2007/02/20/web-of-services-position-paper/#comment-4219</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Targeting the Enterprise Means Ignoring the World...&lt;/strong&gt;

Once I have some time I need to do a simple app that reads Pete Lacey&#8217;s feed and simply posts a new item here every time he writes something. Should be doable with a few lines of code, and would be a nice demo of Atom/APP features &#8230; Anyway,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Targeting the Enterprise Means Ignoring the World&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Once I have some time I need to do a simple app that reads Pete Lacey&#8217;s feed and simply posts a new item here every time he writes something. Should be doable with a few lines of code, and would be a nice demo of Atom/APP features &#8230; Anyway,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
